UNIQUE NEWS

Started in 1980s, Zhengzhou Unique Industrial Equipment Co., Ltd (Unique Group) is already a famous manufacturer & developer of mining equipment like stone crushing & screening equipment and ore processing equipment in China. Our products scope mainly includes cone crusher, jaw crusher, impact crusher, sand making machine, vibrating screen, vibrating feeder, belt conveyor, stationary & mobile stone crushing plant, ball mill, magnetic separator and cement production line etc.

Russia and Central Asian countries prefer to use spring cone crushers, why?

2025-08-19 16:07:45

In Russia and Central Asian countries (such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, etc.), the continued popularity of spring cone crushers (e.g., PYB series or similar designs) is the result of the combined effects of local harsh working conditions, historical industrial foundations, economic realities, and resource characteristics. Here is an analysis of the key reasons:

11

Extreme Climates and Demand for Equipment Reliability

 
  • Low-temperature adaptability:
 

In Siberia (Russia) and high-altitude areas of Central Asia, winter temperatures can drop to below -40°C. The purely mechanical structure of spring cone crushers (without complex hydraulic systems) results in far lower failure rates at low temperatures compared to hydraulic cone crushers:

 
  • Hydraulic oil is prone to solidification at low temperatures, requiring additional heating systems, which increases costs and potential failure points.
   
  • Spring mechanisms only require low-temperature grease, making maintenance simple.
   
  • Resistance to harsh working conditions:
 

Remote mining areas face significant power fluctuations and heavy dust. Spring cone crushers are less sensitive to power grid fluctuations, and their mechanical overload protection (springs) is more reliable during sudden iron passage/overload.

Rigid Demand for Processing High-Hardness Materials

 
  • High hardness of mainstream ores:
 

The Ural Mountains (Russia) and mining areas in Kazakhstan are rich in high-hardness rocks (granite, basalt, iron ore). The laminated crushing principle + high-strength frame of spring cone crushers can withstand continuous high-intensity impacts:

Comparison: Impact crushers suffer extremely fast wear of blow bars when crushing high-hardness rocks, resulting in poor economic efficiency; hydraulic cone crushers can handle the task but have high purchase and maintenance costs.

 
  • Effective iron-passing protection mechanism:
 

The spring system automatically lifts the moving cone to release pressure when uncrushable objects (such as drill bits, iron blocks) enter, avoiding main shaft breakage. This is particularly suitable for mining areas with high levels of miscellaneous materials.

Industrial Traditions and Supply Chain Inertia

 
  • Legacy of Soviet-era technology:
 

The region once widely used Soviet-era ПК (similar to PYB) series spring cone crushers. Local engineers are highly familiar with their structure, maintenance, and spare parts replacement.

 
  • Low replacement cost with Chinese equipment:
 

Chinese-made PYB series (e.g., PYB1200, PYB1750) are highly compatible with old Soviet models, and their prices are only 1/3-1/2 of European and American hydraulic cone crushers. Spare parts (springs, liners, copper sleeves) are abundantly supplied.

 
  • Local manufacturing capabilities:
 

Machinery factories in Russia/Kazakhstan (such as Ural Mechanical Plant) can independently produce core components of spring cone crushers, shortening the supply chain.

Economy and Maintenance Convenience

 
  • Low initial investment:
 

Small and medium-sized mines have limited budgets. The purchase cost of spring cone crushers is significantly lower than that of hydraulic cone crushers of the same specification (e.g., PYB1750 costs about 150,000, while equivalent hydraulic cones cost 300,000+).

 
  • Simple maintenance with controllable costs:
  • Replacing liners and adjusting discharge ports only require ordinary tools, which can be operated by local technicians.
  • Key spare parts (such as main shaft copper sleeves) are made of wear-resistant bronze, with a service life of 1-2 years, and replacement costs are lower than the precision bearings and sealing systems of hydraulic cone crushers.
   
  • Low requirements for oil products:
 

Only ordinary gear lubricating oil is needed, whereas hydraulic cone crushers require high-cleanliness hydraulic oil, which is difficult to procure in remote mining areas.

Balance Between Capacity and Particle Shape

 
  • Suitable for connecting primary and secondary crushing:
 

As secondary crushing equipment after jaw crushers (primary crushing), spring cone crushers can crush 300-400mm materials to 40-70mm, meeting local mainstream aggregate specifications (such as railway ballast, coarse concrete aggregates).

 
  • Acceptable particle shape:
 

Although not as good as multi-cylinder hydraulic cone crushers, optimized cavity designs (e.g., standard type, short-head type) can produce particle shapes that meet GOST (Russian standards) or local infrastructure requirements, eliminating the need for additional shaping.

12

Comparison: Why Hydraulic Cone Crushers Have Not Dominated?

 
Factor Advantages of Spring Cone Crushers Disadvantages of Hydraulic Cone Crushers (in Russian/Central Asian Context)
Low-temperature reliability No hydraulic system, no risk of oil solidification Require heating/insulation systems, high failure rates
Adaptability to high-hardness rocks Strong structural rigidity, impact resistance Precision hydraulic components are prone to damage under continuous impact
Purchase cost Low (Chinese equipment with outstanding cost performance) High (dominated by European and American brands)
Maintenance complexity Repairable by on-site technicians independently Dependent on professional engineers and imported spare parts
Spare part cost and availability Localized production, sufficient supply from China Long delivery cycles for European spare parts (affected by sanctions)

Supporting Typical Cases

  • Iron ore mines in Western Siberia, Russia:

Six PYB1750 spring cone crushers are used to process magnetite (Mohs hardness 6.5), operating 6,000 hours annually. The liner service life is 4 months, and the iron-passing protection is triggered over 50 times a year without main shaft damage.

  • Quarry in Almaty, Kazakhstan:

Chinese-made PYB1200 replaced the old Soviet ПК-12, with 80% commonality of spare parts, reducing maintenance costs by 40%.

Summary

The preference for spring cone crushers in Russia and Central Asia is essentially a triple victory of “extreme environment adaptability + rigid demand for high-hardness rock crushing + cost control”:

Reliable survival — mechanical structure conquers severe cold and dust;

Hard rock  (nemesis) — withstanding granite impacts through simple structures;

Economic closed loop — Chinese equipment + localized supply chain reduce full-cycle costs.

Although hydraulic cone crushers lead in efficiency and particle shape, the harsh natural conditions, industrial inertia, and pragmatic economic strategies in the region will keep spring cone crushers irreplaceable for a long time to come.

Home Whatsapp Mail Inquiry